BUDAYA LISAN VS BUDAYA LITERASI MAHASISWA MELAYU:  Implikasinya pada Model Pembelajaran Mahasiswa

Agus Syahrani

doi:10.25077/we.v4.i2.54

BUDAYA LISAN VS BUDAYA LITERASI MAHASISWA MELAYU: Implikasinya pada Model Pembelajaran Mahasiswa

Agus Syahrani

Abstract

This study reflects on complaints that some students have not been able to fulfill their duties and responsibilities to the fullest , especially in fulfilling the tasks of reading and writing . It is assumed to be closely related to the habits of the students related to deep-rooted social and cultural backgrounds of students are predominantly Malay cultural background with kelisanannya identity . Referring to the reality and mind, this study aims to reveal the habits of students in terms of orality and literacy , both as a duty to meet the needs of students as well as for other purposes such as for leisure .
The data collection technique used is the technique of direct observation by researchers , discussion through Focused Group Discussion ( FGD ) and observation indirectly through questionnaires and equipped with library research . Qualitative data obtained from each instrument were analyzed and described qualitatively .

Keywords

budaya lisan; literasi budaya; model pembelajaran; Melayu

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bakran Suni. (2009). Demokrasi dan Budaya Politik Pilihan Raya Umum di Kalimantan Barat Indonesia. Tesis. Bangi: Institut Alam dan Tamadun Melayu Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Bogdan, Robert C., & Biklen, Sari Knopp. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Cruickshank, Donald R. et al. (2006). The Act of Teaching (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Duranti, Alessandro. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Effendy, Chairil. (2006). Sastra Sebagai Wadah Integrasi Budaya. Pontianak: STAIN Pontianak Press.

Ellis, Rod. (2009). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. China: Oxford University Press.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2004). The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Education.

Johnson, Elaine B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It’s Here to Stay. California: Corwin Press.

Kramsch, Claire. (2008). Language and Culture. China: Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, James P. (2007). Intrapersonal Communication and Internalization in the Second Language Classroom. In Alex Kozulin et al (Eds.), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 349-370). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and Literacy The Technologizing of The Word. New York: Methuen.

Panofsky, Carolyn P. (2007). The relations of Learning and Student Social Class: Toward Re-“socializing” Sociocultural Learning Theory. In Alex Kozulin et al (Eds.), Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 349-370). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sudarso (2007). Mobilitas Sosial. In J. Dwi Narwoko & Bagong Suyanto (ed.) Sosiologi: Teks Pengantar dan Terapan (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Kencana.

Suwardi MS. (2008). Dari Melayu ke Indonesia Peranan Kebudayaan Melayu dalam Memperkokoh Identitas dan Jati Diri Bangsa. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.

Teeuw, A. (1994). Indonesia Antara Kelisanan dan Keberaksaraan. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25077/we.v4.i2.54